| 000 | 03214mam a2200373 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 2555992 | ||
| 003 | ARRUPE | ||
| 005 | 20150528132433.0 | ||
| 008 | 991130s2000 inu b 001 0 eng | ||
| 010 | _a 99059811 | ||
| 020 |
_a0268022550 _z0268022500 (alk. paper) (invalid) |
||
| 020 | _a0268022569 (pbk. : alk. paper) | ||
| 035 | _a(OCoLC)ocm42980171 | ||
| 035 | _a(NNC)2555992 | ||
| 040 |
_aDLC _cDLC _dC#P _dOrLoB-B |
||
| 050 | 0 | 0 |
_aJC337 _b.C58 2000 |
| 082 | 0 | 0 |
_a177/.1 _221 |
| 245 | 0 | 0 |
_aCivility / _cedited by Leroy S. Rouner. |
| 260 |
_aNotre Dame, Ind. : _bUniversity of Notre Dame Press, _cc2000. |
||
| 300 |
_axvii, 252 p. ; _c24 cm. |
||
| 490 | 1 |
_aBoston University studies in philosophy and religion ; _vv. 21 |
|
| 504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and indexes. | ||
| 505 | 0 | 0 |
_tIntroduction / _rLeroy S. Rouner -- _gPt. I. _tWhat is Civility? _tIs Civility a Virtue? / _rJames Schmidt. _tCivic Meetings, Cultural Meanings / _rLawrence Cahoone. _tTrust, Confidence, and the Problem of Civility / _rAdam B. Seligman. _tBeyond Courtesy / _rAdam McClellan. _tThe Belligerence of Dogma / _rStephen Toulmin -- _gPt. II. _tThe Civility Debate. _tThe Ethical Status of Civility / _rRobert B. Pippin. _tResponse to Robert B. Pippin / _rDaniel O. Dahlstrom. _tAre We Losing Our Virtue? / _rAlan Wolfe. _tResponse to Alan Wolfe / _rLawrence Cahoone. _tCivility and the Limits to the Tolerable / _rEdwin J. Delattre. _tCivility in the Family / _rCarrie Doehring -- _gPt. III. _tCivility in Various Cultures. _tOn Confucian Civility / _rHenry Rosemont, Jr. _tHarmony, Fragmentation, and Democratic Ritual / _rDavid B. Wong. _tSacred Civilities / _rNinian Smart. _tMaking Peace / _rVirginia Straus. |
| 520 | 1 | _a"Are Americans less civil than they used to be? If so, is that a bad thing? Perhaps we are just learning to be more honest. And what does civility mean? Is it just good manners? Or is civility a question of morality?". | |
| 520 | 8 | _a"In this lively conversation on an increasingly significant theme, major philosophers and religious scholars argue the issue on three levels. The first is manners: Henry Rosemont argues the Confucian case that manners are the substance of social relations, while Edwin Delattre and Adam Seligman believe that the issue is deeper than that; and the sociologist Alan Wolfe is persuaded that we are not less civil or ill-mannered than our predecessors. | |
| 520 | 8 | _aSecondly, as a social issue, James Schmidt, Lawrence Cahoone, and Adam Seligman turn to questions of structure and meaning in a civil society; Ninian Smart, David Wong, and Virginia Straus put the issue in a cross-cultural context; Stephen Toulmin describes the corruption of civility by dogmatism; and Carrier Doehring warns that civility may be a barrier to honest communication in family life. | |
| 520 | 8 | _aFinally, the metaphysical and religious dimensions of civility are explored by Robert Pippin, Adam McClellan, and Daniel Dahlstrom."--BOOK JACKET. | |
| 650 | 0 |
_aCivil society. _917288 |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aCourtesy. _917289 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aRouner, Leroy S. _917290 _eed. |
|
| 830 | 0 |
_aBoston University studies in philosophy and religion ; _vv. 21. _917291 |
|
| 900 | _bTOC | ||
| 942 |
_2lcc _cMONOGRAPH |
||
| 999 |
_c122698 _d122698 |
||