| 000 | 03430mam a2200349 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1726040 | ||
| 003 | ARRUPE | ||
| 005 | 20130924183626.0 | ||
| 008 | 960119s1995 onc b 001 0 eng d | ||
| 020 | _a0802029736 | ||
| 020 | _a0802037747 (pbk.) | ||
| 035 | _a(OCoLC)ocm34057082 | ||
| 035 | _a(NNC)1726040 | ||
| 040 |
_aUCW _cUCW _dNNC _dOrLoB |
||
| 100 | 1 |
_aFalkenstein, Lorne. _91170 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aKant's intuitionism : _ba commentary on the transcendental aesthetic / _cLorne Falkenstein. |
| 260 |
_aToronto ; _aBuffalo : _bUniversity of Toronto Press, _cc1995. |
||
| 300 |
_axxiii, 465 p. ; _c24 cm. |
||
| 490 | 1 | _aToronto studies in philosophy | |
| 504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and indexes. | ||
| 505 | 0 | 0 |
_tIntroduction. _gi. _tNativism and Empirism. _gii. _tIntuitionism and Constructivism. _giii. _tFormal Intuitionism. _giv. _tKant's Formal Intuitionism. _gv. _tGrounds for the Popular Neglect of Formal Intuitionism -- _gPt. I. _tKant's Representation Terminology. _g1. _tThe Distinction between Intuition and Understanding. _gi. _tThe Sense/Intellect Distinction in ID. _gii. _tThe Argument of ID. _giii. _tStrategic Difficulties. _giv. _tThe Distinction between the Faculties in the Critique. _gv. _tThe Circularity Problem. _gvi. _tRegressive Terminology. _g2. _tThe Distinction between Form and Matter of Intuition. _gi. _tThe Two Basic Features of an Intuitive Representation. _gii. _tTextual Evidence against Forms as Mechanisms. _giii. _tTextual Evidence against Forms as Representations. _giv. _tConflicting Passages. _g3. _tSensation and the Matter of Intuition. _gi. _tThe Epistemological Role of Sensation. _gii. _tThe Ontological Status of Sensation. _g4. _tOrigins of the Form and the Matter of Intuition -- _gPt. II. _tThe Expositions. |
| 505 | 8 | 0 |
_g5. _tThe First Exposition. _gi. _tKant's Objectives in the First Exposition. _gii. _tKant's Sensationist Opposition. _giii. _tThe Standard Objection to the First Exposition. _giv. _tThe Grounds of Kant's Rejection of Sensationism. _g6. _tThe Second Exposition. _gi. _tAnalysis of the Argument. _gii. _tThe Inextricability Argument. _giii. _tThe Third Exposition in A and the Validity of Geometry. _giv. _tThe Independence Argument. _g7. _tThe Later Expositions. _gi. _tThe Singularity Argument. _gii. _tThe Whole/Part Priority Argument. _giii. _tThe Infinity Argument. _giv. _tThe Completeness of the Later Expositions. _gv. _tThe Composition of Intelligible Spaces and Times. _g8. _tThe Transcendental Expositions. _gi. _tThe Buttressing Argument. _gii. _tThe Subjectivity Argument. _giii. _tThe Explanation of the Possibility of Geometry and Mechanics -- _gPt. III. _tConclusions from the Above Concepts. _g9. _tKant's Argument for the Non-spatiotemporality of Things in Themselves. _gi. _tSubstantival Space and Time. _gii. _tRelative Space and Time. |
| 505 | 8 | 0 |
_giii. _tLimits of Kant's Result. _g10. _tThe Unknowability Thesis and the Problem of Affection. _gi. _tUnknowability. _gii. _tAffection. _g11. _tKant, Mendelssohn, Lambert, and the Subjectivity of Time. _gi. _tKant's Subjectivity Thesis. _gii. _tMendelssohn's Objection. _giii. _tKant's Response to Mendelssohn and the Subjectivity Thesis. |
| 600 | 1 | 0 |
_aKant, Immanuel, _d1724-1804. _tKritik der reinen Vernunft. _91171 |
| 650 | 0 |
_aIntuition. _91172 |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aTranscendentalism. _91173 |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aAesthetics. _91174 |
|
| 830 | 0 |
_aToronto studies in philosophy. _91175 |
|
| 900 | _bTOC | ||
| 942 |
_2lcc _cMONOGRAPH |
||
| 948 | 1 |
_a20070118 _bc _crad1 _dMPS |
|
| 999 |
_c118021 _d118021 |
||